Description
Several countries have implemented programmes to control non-regulated cattle diseases in the European Union, impairing the comparison of the confidence of freedom for cattle originating from different countries. In order to facilitate safe trade, there is a need to support the development of transparent methods that enable comparison of outputs of surveillance, control or eradication programmes.
In this Action, Innovative methods for Standardizing OUtput-based surveillance to control Non-regulated Diseases in the EU (SOUND-control), work will be conducted in five workgroups to develop a generic and joint understanding about the requirements and characteristics needed for proof of freedom and subsequent costs-effectiveness, regardless of heterogeneities in the underlying data. SOUND-control will coordinate, stimulate and assist with initiatives to explore and implement a widely adaptable, output-based framework to substantiate confidence of freedom from infection and assess epidemiological and economic equivalence of control efforts.
The workgroups will describe current control programmes, provide requirements for an output-based framework, evaluate data availability and assess available and innovative methods for objective and standardised output-based comparison.
With the new Animal Health Law, it is anticipated that disease control will progressively change towards output-based approaches. SOUND-control will support the Animal Health Law by providing requirements and demands for a single general regulatory framework, adaptable to multiple diseases, which aims to enhance the safety of trade. Although the primary focus of this Action concerns non-regulated diseases, the outcomes of this work will be applicable to regulated diseases in the EU, which are currently underpinned by input-based standards.
Action keywords
proof of freedom - disease control programmes - surveillance - cattle - output-based
Management Committee
| Country | MC Member |
|---|---|
| Albania | |
| Austria | |
| Belgium | |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | |
| Croatia | |
| Croatia | |
| Denmark | |
| Denmark | |
| Estonia | |
| Estonia | |
| Finland | |
| Finland | |
| France | |
| France | |
| Germany | |
| Germany | |
| Greece | |
| Greece | |
| Hungary | |
| Ireland | |
| Ireland | |
| Italy | |
| Latvia | |
| Latvia | |
| Lithuania | |
| Netherlands | |
| Netherlands | |
| North Macedonia | |
| North Macedonia | |
| Norway | |
| Norway | |
| Poland | |
| Poland | |
| Portugal | |
| Portugal | |
| Romania | |
| Serbia | |
| Slovakia | |
| Slovenia | |
| Slovenia | |
| Spain | |
| Spain | |
| Sweden | |
| Switzerland | |
| Switzerland | |
| Türkiye | |
| Türkiye | |
| United Kingdom | |
| United Kingdom |
Main Contacts
Action Contacts
COST Staff
Leadership
| Role | Leader |
|---|---|
| Action Chair | |
| Action Vice-Chair | |
| Grant Holder Scientific Representative | |
| Science Communication Coordinator | |
| Grant Awarding Coordinator | |
| WG1 Leader | |
| WG2 Leader | |
| WG3 Leader | |
| WG4 Leader | |
| WG5 Leader |
Additional roles
| Role | Leader |
|---|---|
| ITC CG Coordinator | |
| STSM Coordinator |
Working Groups
| Number | Title | Leader |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | WG1. Characteristics of existing CPs and requirements for an output-based framework | |
| 2 | WG2. Data requirements and availability | |
| 3 | WG3. Evaluate existing methods with potential for output-based comparison of CPs | |
| 4 | WG4. Stimulate initiatives aiming at development of methodologies that address knowledge gaps | |
| 5 | WG5. Dissemination and adoption |
Membership
| Name | Working Group | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WG 1, WG 3 | Türkiye | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | Greece | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | Portugal | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | Greece | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | Norway | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | North Macedonia | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | Italy | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | Sweden | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | ||
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | ||
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | Slovenia | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | Romania | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | Kosovo* | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | Slovenia | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | United Kingdom | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | ||
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | France | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | Greece | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | United Kingdom | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | United Kingdom | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | United Kingdom | |
| WG 1, WG 2, WG 3, WG 4, WG 5 | Romania |