Blogs are written by COST Actions
The History of Identity Documentation in European Nations (HIDDEN) network unites scholars in history, migration studies, geography, sociology, law, linguistics, postcolonial studies, human rights and more to look at the history of ID regimes in Europe and beyond, drawing connections between the past and present.
Dr Eve Hayes de Kalaf from the Institute of Historical Research, University of London, was the recipient of a HIDDEN grant to carry out a Short-Term Scientific Mission in the Netherlands. Here she shares her experience and learnings from the CitizenGap Project.
Undocumented persons are typically assumed to be migrants. Currently, however, one in seven people around the world still lacks the essential documentation they need to evidence that they are indeed citizens. In his book The Invention of the Passport, John Torpey reminds us of the importance of documents as they “…constitute the ‘proof’ of our identities for administrative purposes, and permit states to establish an enduring embrace of those admitted into their communities…” (Torpey 2000, 166). But what happens when a state struggles to determine a person’s legal identity, or when contestations emerge over the community to which a person claims they belong? These questions are becoming increasingly urgent over the coming decade as the United Nations strives to achieve its highly ambitious Sustainable Development Goal 16.9 of providing legal identity for every living person on this planet by 2030.
Statelessness, Inclusion and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
To learn more about the activities taking place in the run-up to the 2030 SDGs, I headed to the Netherlands on my first ever Short-Term Scientific Mission (STSM). My first port of call was a visit to the new offices of the Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion (ISI) in Rotterdam. I first encountered this organisation back in 2014 when I secured a scholarship with the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) to take part in their week-long statelessness course at the University of Tilburg. The experience helped me better understand the international approaches to tackling statelessness which take inspiration from a human rights-based framework. Upon arrival at ISI, I met with their Programme and Education Officer Vera Karanika and Stefania Tantimonaco, a Programme Assistant. Together, we discussed ISI’s current UN-level work with stakeholders in Geneva and New York as well as their ongoing engagement with in-country NGOs and activists on statelessness and nationality issues.
It was good to reconnect with ISI colleagues. Two years prior to my visit, we had organised the conference (Re)Imagining Belonging in Latin America and Beyond: Access to Citizenship, Digital Identity and Rights as part of my fellowship with the Centre for Latin American and Caribbean Studies (CLACS) at the University of London. This event examined emerging research which is providing some uncomfortable insights into the use of modern-day identity-based development ‘solutions’ to discriminate against some minority groups. My recent book Legal Identity, Race and Belonging in the Dominican Republic: From Citizen to Foreigner (Anthem Press, 2023) evidences how the state used its civil registry to block documented Haitian-descended people – who had a legal right to citizenship – from obtaining or renewing their Dominican identity cards. In recent years, ISI has created numerous educational resources and tools for NGOs and governments to highlight issues such as the Dominican case. This includes their recent publication Surviving Statelessness And Trafficking: A Rohingya Case Study Of Intersection And Protection Gaps. The ISI has also created a Database on Statelessness and Human Rights which aims to support adherence to human rights standards by helping users compare and analyse global data. Their upcoming World Conference on Statelessness will take place in Kuala Lumpur in February 2024. This major event will be of interest to HIDDEN members as it will bring together over 300 participants to share their professional and lived experiences of statelessness.
Digital Technologies, Racial Profiling and Bureaucratic Exclusion
During my visit, I spoke briefly with Dr Frederiek de Vlaming, a criminologist specialising in international criminal law and transitional justice who is currently working with Suriname migrants. Her research includes a focus on children who are born Dutch citizens yet face challenges in proving their status due to a lack of paperwork. I also reached out to the team at the Dutch NGO ASKV Refugee Support, an Amsterdam-based organisation that provides legal and social assistance to people unsuccessfully applying for refugee status. ASKV has worked on the Dutch Childcare Benefits Scandal, the toeslagenffaire, which in 2019 erupted into controversy when the tax authorities were exposed for having implemented an algorithm that flagged suspected fraudulent profiles to state officials. These actions raised serious questions about the use of ID systems to racially profile ethnic minorities and their families and highlighted serious limitations with the use of artificial intelligence in modern bureaucracies.
The Dutch Childcare Benefits Scandal has strong parallels with the current project I am working on: The Windrush Scandal in a Transnational and Commonwealth Context. In 2012, the UK government launched its hostile environment strategy which consisted in a supposed crackdown on illegal immigration. Notwithstanding, in 2018 it emerged that Black and Asian people from the Commonwealth, who had already settled as citizens of the UK and colonies, were being forcibly and wrongfully detained and removed from the country. The Home Office attempted to reason that the scandal was due to widespread government ineptitude and ignorance. Yet improvements in digital technologies, government communications and information-sharing systems made it easier for immigration officials to identify the individual cases of persons whose legal status was in doubt.
The CitizenGap Project
I was very grateful to receive an invitation from the Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR), University of Amsterdam, to give a lecture on the Windrush Scandal to PhD students currently working on issues of citizenship, migration and ID. As a collective, we agreed there needs to be greater understanding of identity systems in a postcolonial context. The lecture was hosted by Dr Imke Harbers associate professor of political science, University of Amsterdam. In 2020, Dr Harbers was awarded a major European Research Council Starting Grant for her project CitizenGap.
Currently in its second year, CitizenGap is a timely initiative examining how people navigate their day-to-day lives when a system fails to acknowledge their legal existence. The project also looks at how and why states choose to invest in civil registrations. Overall, the project seeks to reframe current thinking about the role of birth registrations, biometrics, voter ID and welfare in challenging and (re)defining a person’s legal status.
Registrations, Resistance and Remembering
I was determined that my trip would not be all work and no play, so I took myself sightseeing in Amsterdam. Some of the highlights included a boat tour of the city, a visit to Madame Tussauds and entry to ARTIS Amsterdam Royal Zoo with my daughter. Unexpectedly, however, I also stumbled across an important commemorative plaque that really brought home the relevance of the HIDDEN network. The plaque paid homage to persons killed on 27 March 1943 during a bomb attack the Dutch resistance had led against the Amsterdam civil registry. The Nazis were using the registry to identify 70,000 Jews living in the city. They took advantage of these details to then cross-check the information recorded on people’s identity cards. The discovery of this plaque then led me to explore the fantastic Dutch Resistance Museum which has a thought-provoking exhibition on identity documentation during the Second World War. The museum provided a stark and moving reminder that, when abused, bureaucracies and identity systems can play a central role in the targeting, identification, and, horrifyingly, the extermination of selected ‘undesirable’ minority groups.
Bordering Practices and Travel in a Post-Brexit World
It must be said, my experience of travelling to the Netherlands to participate in this STSM was not entirely problem free. A recent visit to Hook of Holland just a few months earlier had already left me shaken. Travelling with a friend and our three young children, a Dutch immigration official had stopped us to overzealously demand, “Where are the fathers?” The border guard then ordered that we both produce a copy of our children’s birth certificates to prove that we were indeed their mothers and had permission from the two men to leave the country. Acutely sensitive to the levels of linguistic, racial and class privileges that equipped us with the tools to negotiate our way out of this distressing situation, the interaction reminded me just how deeply interwoven practices of exclusion, gender and racial discrimination, and prejudice, remain within bordering processes. This negative encounter highlighted my vulnerability as a single mother attempting to accompany my young child as a non-EU national into the Netherlands.
Still reeling from our post-Brexit hangover, the UK finds itself in a state of severe social and economic crisis. On this trip, I experienced first-hand the impact of my country’s decision to exit the European Union: the long queues, the cancelled flights, the crowded airports and the lengthy waits at immigration for the now obligatory stamp inside my passport. It served as a stark reminder that the former protections I had once taken for granted have now all but disappeared.
Sad times indeed.
Learning from Lived Experiences and Looking towards the Future
Principally, my trip to the Netherlands has allowed me to explore the historical, colonial, and emerging linkages between identity documentation systems and the different methods states are now implementing to achieve legal identity for all by 2030. This STSM has helped me (re)connect with colleagues at ISI, CitizenGap, the University of Amsterdam, and others. I have engaged with multiple stakeholders working on statelessness, under-documentation and access to citizenship, including NGO representatives, PhD researchers, academics, activists, museum curators and artists.
Earlier this year, I had the great honour of presenting my keynote ‘Is Digital Identity for All Really Achievable?’ at the launch of this COST Action network. I am now buzzing with enthusiasm and new ideas about the new direction my research will take. I will be reporting back on these findings as co-leader of our Working Group 3 ‘Accessing Citizenship’ alongside my colleague Prof Michael Geary. This STSM has broadened my thinking and has allowed me to look at, and learn from, the stories of migrant-descended citizens and racialised groups who are in a battle with the state to obtain their papers. While I believe that governments would like us to see these disputes as isolated incidents or anomalies, there is strong emerging evidence highlighting that ID systems – or the lack of established identification practices – are sometimes implemented to the detriment of some minority groups.
These observations are necessary as we examine the implementation of the SDGs and ask if the identification of all people will inevitably result in improved rights for all.
Author
Dr Eve Hayes de Kalaf is a research fellow at the Institute of Historical Research, University of London and is co-leader of the HIDDEN Working Group on Accessing Citizenship. Her work focuses specifically on digital identity and access to citizenship across Latin America and the Caribbean examining how governments can use state infrastructures to block or deny migrant-descended citizens access to their ID.